Steven Simpson’s Death Should Not Be Dismissed


Above: Steven Simpson

Content Warning: Contains Description Of An Ableist/Homophobic Killing.

In the early hours of the 23rd of June, Steven Simpson was set on fire by 20 year old Jordan Sheard, who had gate-crashed his house party in Cudworth, near Barnsley. He had been verbally abused, stripped of his clothes and had phrases like “I love dick” and “gay boy” scrawled across his body. He was then doused in tanning oil and Sheard lit his crotch with a cigarette lighter, and the flames engulfed his body. Those involved fled as Simpson’s neighbour tried desperately to put out the flames. Simpson died the next day after enduring 60% burns to his body.

Steven Simpson’s death was the result of the hatred and humiliation caused to him because of his sexuality, and his disability. He was bullied, de-humanised and then killed. It follows the format of many killings of LGBTQ people world wide.

Sheffield Crown Court’s view on the matter has been frankly disgusting. Judge Roger Keen dismissed the crime as a ‘good-natured horseplay’ that had gone too far, and sentenced him to a unusually short sentence of three and a half years in prison. Sheard’s defence lawyer called what happened to Simpson as a ‘stupid prank that went wrong in a bad way’.

This was clearly a hate crime. Simpson was being taunted for his sexuality and his disability. He was devalued so much in the eyes of those involved, that they thought setting him on fire was somehow acceptable. He was a bright young man studying at Barnsley College, but his last moments alive on this earth must have been dehumanising, painful and terrifying.

How Judge Roger Keen can dismiss this so flippantly as “horseplay” is beyond me. He is re-enforcing the same notions that lead to Steven’s death: that homophobic bullying is fun, rather than a crime against LGBTQ people, that it is okay to mock or take advantage of someone’s disability, rather than looking out for them and treating them with respect, that setting someone on fire and burning them to death is “a joke too far”, rather than one of the inevitable consequences of the way we still treat people like Steven in our society.

It makes me sick to the stomach to think someone so young has been killed because he was different – and the frightening fact is that could have been any one of us that lives with a disability, or who is LGBTQ. Many have commented on the lenient sentencing of Steven’s killer, however I think this misses the point. The point here is the criminal justice system is complicit in the oppression of LGBTQ people and disabled people, when it makes comments like those of Judge Keen’s. It is churning out the very same ideas that lead to hate-crime.

It is not a joke, funny, or horseplay to treat someone in the way Steven was and we should not condone it as such. If we do condone this behaviour  we are sending out the message that LGBTQ people and disabled people are fair game to be bullied and preyed upon. We are sending out the message that this okay for other young people to do what was done to Steven. It appears it is all okay with Judge Keen, just as long as you don’t kill someone.

But the point is, the way Steven was killed, was precisely a result of how he was treated. If he had just been treated like any other young person, with a bit of decency or respect, it would never have happened.

This is the message that Sheffield Crown Court should have put out. We should condemn Judge Keen’s remarks, call for him to make an apology, and call for Sheffield Crown Court to recognise the daily battle people like Steven face because of their sexuality and their disability. Sign the petition against Judge Keen’s remarks here:

Steven’s death should serve as a reminder of what our LGBTQ and disabled youth face today.

Maxi B



  1. Maxi
    Thanks for bringing this to people’s attention.
    I’d be interested in helping raise this within the Lgbt / trade union movement in the north east.
    I’m a supporter of workers liberty. Could you perhaps write something for our paper Solidarity?

    Have you any thoughts on demands / actions.

    What would a trade union motion on this issue demand or call for?

    • That would be great, so far ive just written this but a petition being put together asking for the Judge to apologise for his comments, and recognise the struggle LGBTQ and Disabled youth face, could be a demand. Other than that im unsure but welcome people spreading the story and taking action, you are welcome to put this in your paper.

      Im based in Sheffield where the case was heard and am trying to get in touch with the UCU at Barnsley College where Steven went to see what they know.

      What do you think?

  2. Petition sounds good, and getting involved with both UCU and NUS / student youth / disability and LGBTQ groups as well.
    I think a picket or protest outside the court would be good. See if this could involve trade unionists, students, LGBTQ and disablity groups to call it. I am sure Sheffield AWL could help with this too?
    What do you think?
    Would it be possible to do something during Sheffield Pride in July?
    I am sure stalls will be very expensive as they are all pretty commerical now, but perhaps a town centre stall that weekend with petitions?
    I will chat to Rosie as well after NUS conference. but doing something there seems like a good idea at its in Sheffield.

  3. Pingback: Justice for Steven Simpson – Vigil at NUS conference – 9 April | nusconference2013

  4. Pingback: Justice for Steven Simpson – Vigil at NUS conference – 9 April — National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s